Translate

Pages

Pages

Pages

Intro Video

Wednesday, February 26, 2020

Report: Georgia Ranks No. 1 in “Best States for Black Entrepreneurs”

Georgia black entrepreneurship

Georgia is the best state for black entrepreneurship–with Texas, Florida, California, and North Carolina rounding out the top five–according to FitSmallBusiness.com, which recently compiled the list.

The study found that the top-ranking states had high numbers of African American-owned businesses as well as fair average corporate tax rates. With black-owned businesses steadily increasing, these states offer assets to black entrepreneurs. States were ranked according to social and financial equality, black-owned business success, economic health, and startup climate and opportunity.

According to research done by the Kaufman Foundation, blacks between the ages of 24-35 are 50% are more likely than whites to engage in entrepreneurial activities. In other words, the most active group of entrepreneurs in America is black men and women. Black entrepreneurship is on the rise in general, but particularly for black women. The number of businesses owned by African American women grew 322% since 1997, making black females the fastest-growing group of entrepreneurs in the U.S.

Overall, the number of women-owned businesses grew by 74% between 1997 and 2015—a rate that’s 1.5 times the national average, according to the “2015 State of Women-Owned Businesses Report,” commissioned by American Express Open. Women now own 30% of all businesses in the U.S., accounting for some 9.4 million firms. African American women control 14% of these companies, an estimated 1.3 million businesses, according to Fortune.com.

FitSmallBusiness.com also polled over 1,300 adults in the U.S. about their opinions regarding black entrepreneurship. Roughly 39% agreed that the economy would be in a better position if black entrepreneurs had more opportunities.

“With this being the inaugural study, our goal was to focus on the data that paints an overall picture of what the African American entrepreneur faces in the business world. While we weren’t surprised by certain findings, some of the state rankings told an interesting story of the unique journeys that African American entrepreneurs have to traverse,” said Michael De Medeiros, FitSmallBusiness.com’s special project editor, said in a press release.



from Black Enterprise https://ift.tt/3ce8fD8
via

Kenya university's rape memo sparks anger

The University of Nairobi apologises after blaming "reckless" female students for becoming victims.

from BBC News - Africa https://ift.tt/2HZ0frq
via

Christian Bassogog: Cameroon striker pledges $16,000 to compatriots in China

Cameroon forward Christian Bassogog donates $16,000 to help Cameroonians living in areas of China hit by the coronavirus.

from BBC News - Africa https://ift.tt/2Pqvksi
via

Lights\! Camera\! Meeting\! Video Conferencing Gets a Makeover

Companies like Zoom and Microsoft are trying to make the remote connections more real—and fun. Trouble is, humans are awkward.

from Wired https://ift.tt/39dvOK0
via

Chinese Hospitals Deploy AI to Help Diagnose Covid-19

Software that reads CT lung scans had primarily been used to detect cancer. Now, it's been retooled to look for signs of pneumonia caused by coronavirus.

from Wired https://ift.tt/3c9cekb
via

The Secret to Enjoying Nature Is … Your Phone

I was spending way too much time staring at outdoorsy influencers on Instagram. So I downloaded the iNaturalist app—and stepped outside myself.

from Wired https://ift.tt/3cadovJ
via

This Clever Robotic Finger Feels With Light

The nerves in human fingertips are great at sensing things. For robots, learning to touch is more complicated.

from Wired https://ift.tt/3c6hapY
via

WIRED's 13 Must-Read Books for Spring

Spring is a time of renewal—and the best way to renew your fritzed brain is with new books about robots, hackers, and our fraught digital lives.

from Wired https://ift.tt/392ne0O
via

Hosni Mubarak: Egypt holds military funeral for ousted president

Mubarak was forced out of office by an Arab Spring uprising in 2011, after 30 years in power.

from BBC News - Africa https://ift.tt/2Vquf7A
via

Appeal for more funds to help Africa stop locust swarms

The UN warns that time is short to stop locusts threatening food supplies in some countries.

from BBC News - Africa https://ift.tt/2uzLXus
via

Tuesday, February 25, 2020

Protecting sensitive metadata so it can’t be used for surveillance

MIT researchers have designed a scalable system that secures the metadata — such as who’s corresponding and when — of millions of users in communications networks, to help protect the information against possible state-level surveillance.

Data encryption schemes that protect the content of online communications are prevalent today. Apps like WhatsApp, for instance, use “end-to-end encryption” (E2EE), a scheme that ensures third-party eavesdroppers can’t read messages sent by end users.

But most of those schemes overlook metadata, which contains information about who’s talking, when the messages are sent, the size of message, and other information. Many times, that’s all a government or other hacker needs to know to track an individual. This can be especially dangerous for, say, a government whistleblower or people living in oppressive regimes talking with journalists.

Systems that fully protect user metadata with cryptographic privacy are complex, and they suffer scalability and speed issues that have so far limited their practicality. Some methods can operate quickly but provide much weaker security. In a paper being presented at the USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation, the MIT researchers describe “XRD” (for Crossroads), a metadata-protection scheme that can handle cryptographic communications from millions of users in minutes, whereas traditional methods with the same level of security would take hours to send everyone’s messages.

“There is a huge lack in protection for metadata, which is sometimes very sensitive. The fact that I’m sending someone a message at all is not protected by encryption,” says first author Albert Kwon PhD ’19, a recent graduate from the Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory (CSAIL). “Encryption can protect content well. But how can we fully protect users from metadata leaks that a state-level adversary can leverage?”

Joining Kwon on the paper are David Lu, an undergraduate in the Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science; and Srinivas Devadas, the Edwin Sibley Webster Professor of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science in CSAIL.

New spin on mix nets

Starting in 2013, disclosures of classified information by Edward Snowden revealed widespread global surveillance by the U.S. government. Although the mass collection of metadata by the National Security Agency was subsequently discontinued, in 2014 former director of the NSA and the Central Intelligence Agency Michael Hayden explained that the government can often rely solely on metadata to find the information it’s seeking. As it happens, this is right around the time Kwon started his PhD studies.

“That was like a punch to the cryptography and security communities,” Kwon says. “That meant encryption wasn’t really doing anything to stop spying in that regard.”

Kwon spent most of his PhD program focusing on metadata privacy. With XRD, Kwon says he “put a new spin” on a traditional E2EE metadata-protecting scheme, called “mix nets,” which was invented decades ago but suffers from scalability issues.

Mix nets use chains of servers, known as mixes, and public-private key encryption. The first server receives encrypted messages from many users and decrypts a single layer of encryption from each message. Then, it shuffles the messages in random order and transmits them to the next server, which does the same thing, and so on down the chain. The last server decrypts the final encryption layer and sends the message to the target receiver.

Servers only know the identities of the immediate source (the previous server) and immediate destination (the next server). Basically, the shuffling and limited identity information breaks the link between source and destination users, making it very difficult for eavesdroppers to get that information. As long as one server in the chain is “honest”— meaning it follows protocol — metadata is almost always safe.

However, “active attacks” can occur, in which a malicious server in a mix net tampers with the messages to reveal user sources and destinations. In short, the malicious server can drop messages or modify sending times to create communications patterns that reveal direct links between users.

Some methods add cryptographic proofs between servers to ensure there’s been no tampering. These rely on public key cryptography, which is secure, but it’s also slow and limits scaling. For XRD, the researchers invented a far more efficient version of the cryptographic proofs, called “aggregate hybrid shuffle,” that guarantees servers are receiving and shuffling message correctly, to detect any malicious server activity.

Each server has a secret private key and two shared public keys. Each server must know all the keys to decrypt and shuffle messages. Users encrypt messages in layers, using each server’s secret private key in its respective layer. When a server receives messages, it decrypts and shuffles them using one of the public keys combined with its own private key. Then, it uses the second public key to generate a proof confirming that it had, indeed, shuffled every message without dropping or manipulating any. All other servers in the chain use their secret private keys and the other servers’ public keys in a way that verifies this proof. If, at any point in the chain, a server doesn’t produce the proof or provides an incorrect proof, it’s immediately identified as malicious.

This relies on a clever combination of the popular public key scheme with one called “authenticated encryption,” which uses only private keys but is very quick at generating and verifying the proofs. In this way, XRD achieves tight security from public key encryption while running quickly and efficiently.   

To further boost efficiency, they split the servers into multiple chains and divide their use among users. (This is another traditional technique they improved upon.) Using some statistical techniques, they estimate how many servers in each chain could be malicious, based on IP addresses and other information. From that, they calculate how many servers need to be in each chain to guarantee there’s at least one honest server.  Then, they divide the users into groups that send duplicate messages to multiple, random chains, which further protects their privacy while speeding things up.

Getting to real-time

In computer simulations of activity from 2 million users sending messages on a network of 100 servers, XRD was able to get everyone’s messages through in about four minutes. Traditional systems using the same server and user numbers, and providing the same cryptographic security, took one to two hours.

“This seems slow in terms of absolute speed in today’s communication world,” Kwon says. “But it’s important to keep in mind that the fastest systems right now [for metadata protection] take hours, whereas ours takes minutes.”

Next, the researchers hope to make the network more robust to few users and in instances where servers go offline in the midst of operations, and to speed things up. “Four minutes is acceptable for sensitive messages and emails where two parties’ lives are in danger, but it’s not as natural as today’s internet,” Kwon says. “We want to get to the point where we’re sending metadata-protected messages in near real-time.”



from MIT News https://ift.tt/2vkaHXM
via

Michael Bloomberg spokesperson blames Sanders rhetoric after Chicago office vandalized

Over the weekend, yet another one of Mike Bloomberg’s campaign offices was vandalized. His team wasted no time blaming Democratic presidential primary rival Bernie Sanders‘ rhetoric for inspiring the graffiti.

According to the Chicago Sun-Times, Sunday, the campaign headquarters in Chicago was spray-painted with the words “oligarch,” “racist,” and “sexist,” and “GOP” in red across the office’s front windows.

READ MORE: OPINION: Mike Bloomberg, can keep his apology. Black people don’t need it.

Kevin Sheekey, Bloomberg’s campaign manager, released a statement explaining that the authorities have yet to identify the perpetrators. However, his camp believed that Sanders using the term “oligarch” to describe Bloomberg while campaigning across the country inspired the actions of the vandals.

“While we do not know who is directly responsible, we do know Senator Bernie Sanders and his campaign have repeatedly invoked this language, and the word ‘oligarch’ specifically when discussing Mike Bloomberg and his campaign,” Sheekey said.

READ MORE: Lawsuit alleges Michael Bloomberg told female employee to hire ‘some Black’ to be nanny

“Sen. Sanders’ refusal to denounce these illegal acts is a sign of his inability to lead, and his willingness to condone and promote Trump-like rhetoric has no place in our politics,” he added. “No one should have to live in fear of coming to work, and Sen. Sanders must call on his supporters — including his campaign staff — to elevate the discourse in this campaign and end their spread of hateful rhetoric.”

This is only the latest incident against Bloomberg’s campaign offices across the country. Fox News reports that Friday evening the windows were also shattered by rocks at Bloomberg’s campaign offices in Salt Lake City. The billionaire businessman’s campaign offices in Ohio, Michigan, and Tennessee were also targeted by graffiti and vandalism.

READ MORE: OPINION: Michael Bloomberg has best plan to close the achievement gap in our schools

 

 

The post Michael Bloomberg spokesperson blames Sanders rhetoric after Chicago office vandalized appeared first on TheGrio.



from TheGrio https://ift.tt/3agztqX
via

Why Black & Brown Bernie Sanders supporters need to hold his campaign accountable

This past week, Bernie Sanders‘ campaign got an undeniable boost after he won the caucuses in Nevada.  It made him the first candidate (from either party) to win the popular vote in all three early states in a competitive primary.

This is no small feat and something that should be fully acknowledged for what it could mean in the upcoming election. A sentiment that Sanders himself seemed to echo when he posted on his Twitter feed, “I’ve got news for the Republican establishment. I’ve got news for the Democratic establishment. They can’t stop us.”

While many found this inspiring, in response to his message, filmmaker Ava DuVernay wrote, “I’m undecided. But I know this isn’t what I want.”

READ MORE: Ava Duvernay allegedly receiving threats from Bernie Sanders supporters

“People on here getting emotional about one man without keeping their eye on the real ball,” she elaborated after receiving dismayed messages from Sanders supporters.

She then clarified, “I understand exactly what he’s saying here and I don’t agree with it. He can’t win that way. And he surely cannot govern that way. How’s he gonna get anything passed? How’s he gonna move anything forward?”

I personally watched all this happen in real-time. Soon, what was just a regular debate amongst people who all agreed Trump needed to be run out of office turned into an ugly and at times deeply disheartening attack on DuVernay’s character.

When I chimed in that this sort of overzealous approach was off-putting and dangerously close to the problematic behavior of the “Bernie Bros” – a sub-sect of Sanders fanatics who do a disservice to the rest of his supporters by using misogyny and racism as a tactic – suddenly I became a target as well. Simply for pointing out (as I usually do) that I find it hard to stand in allegiance with those who think you have to drag people during disagreements.

READ MORE: Fight breaks out at Bernie Sanders rally over ‘Black Guns Matter’ T-shirt

Over the next 48 hours, DuVernay allegedly received threats to her safety that my cohorts and I quickly reported and then blocked for our own peace of mind. I was repeatedly disheartened by the way people justified their bad behavior.

Bernie Sanders loves this country and sincerely wants to shake things up to help those less fortunate. I believe that wholeheartedly based on his decades of service to this country and communities of color. But those supporters that I ran into last weekend called me a “b*tch” more times than I can count even though I kept my cool the entire time. THEY are something else.

So it begs the question: after four years of condemning Trump supporters for acting as if their candidate is above reproach and chastising them for their inability to take criticism without going ape-sh*t, HOW on earth did that same nastiness end up seeping onto the other side?

And more importantly, how do we stop ourselves from becoming mirror images of the very thing we all claim to be against?

READ MORE: Black conservative Candace Owens warns Black voters about ‘racist’ Bernie Sanders

Bernie Bros, Russians and everything in between

When I mentioned my Twitter run-in to friends, many of them, particularly those of them who work in media, noted that they had similar experiences: not just online but at dinner parties and other gatherings.

Listening to their accounts made me reflect and then admit that yes – on more than one occasion, I too had found myself making small talk with an extra passionate Sanders supporter and watched a wave of deep irritation flash across their face when I voiced questions or concerns about the campaign.

Initially, I brushed this off but over the years have come across several Bernie fans in my orb who I now don’t talk politics with anymore. This is not because I don’t want to hear their input but more so due to the growing intolerance that they’ve exhibited towards anyone who isn’t “feeling the Bern!” yet.

And no one phrase makes that intolerance rear its ugly head faster than “Bernie Bros.”

READ MORE: Iconic Black feminist who helped coin ‘Identity Politics,’ endorses Bernie Sanders

In fact, me invoking their name on Saturday is most likely why all those angry people on Twitter blew up my notifications. Their overwhelming consensus was that “Bernie Bros” don’t exist; they are merely a “narrative” that has been created to thwart the campaign and anyone who dares bring them up must be a Russian bot.

I can assure you that I am not a bot. But there does appear to be two major themes at play here.

On one hand, yes, there are definitely those who seek to undermine the Sanders campaign, and we’ve known for years that Russia (and God knows who else) has waged cyber warfare on our country’s election process in an effort to disrupt our democracy. That is a matter of public record at this point and I would never pretend otherwise.

On the other hand, there are is a subgroup of Sanders supporters who believe that he is the only person who can save us, are convinced that anyone who isn’t with him is automatically the enemy and have zero bandwidth to ever acknowledge places where he may have blind spots. The worst of this subgroup is what people now call Bernie Bros.

Now, is it possible for these two realities to co-exist as individual issues? Of course. But unfortunately, more times than not, they seem to get conflated as being one and the same. This is perhaps why every time I ask a Sanders supporter how they feel about Bernie Bros or just overzealous devotees in general, the answer is repeatedly, “Russian bots! GOP! It’s a conspiracy!”

READ MORE: Jason Johnson slammed for calling Sanders’ aides ‘island of misfit Black girls’

While those issues are valid, when Susan from Philadelphia who has a social media page dating back a decade – complete with pictures of her kids, her husband, and her dog –  decides to tweet me on a Sunday afternoon, “STFU, you stupid b*tch,” just because I voiced a concern – that’s not Russia.

Can we all agree that the Susan’s of the world, along with all those people I now avoid getting “too deep” with about politics for fear of getting cussed out, are NOT Russia? Because it’s physically impossible to address this problem while so many of you are refusing to admit it even exists.

Black & Brown folks, get yo’ cousins

I can already hear some of you now, “But Blue, as long as Bernie beats Trump, why does it matter if his supporters talk to you crazy? Isn’t a win enough? And how is it his fault that his folks are wilding out?”

To answer that question succinctly, actually yes, it does matter.

For the record, most of the people I saw acting a fool towards me or Ava DuVernay during last week’s online Bernie debate were not people of color. And I point this out because we all know that racist white liberals are real and bold AF.

But to all the people of color who love Bernie, I implore you to keep the rest of your cohorts accountable. Because if we get to a place where his campaign allows that sort of behavior to keep growing, at some point, you will be next. Problematic white people who are left unchecked just become even more problematic. All you have to do is crack open a history book and confirm this for yourself.

READ MORE: Fears of Bernie Sanders win growing among Democratic establishment

Also, it absolutely matters how Sanders manages his supporters. We’ve seen time and time again that how a candidate runs a campaign is almost always a glimpse into how he (and hopefully someday she) will run the country. So, if he can’t effectively mitigate the damage caused by the Bernie Bros or anyone else in his ranks, it’s 100% relevant to be concerned about that.

And lastly, let’s discuss this concept of “winning by any means necessary.”

As I alluded to previously, in 2016, Bernard Sanders was robbed. He was robbed by the Russians, the GOP, and dare I say it – yes even the DNC. His seat at the throne was stolen and ultimately gifted to a man who has left Cheeto stained paw prints all over the fabric of this country.

As a result, the Bernie of 2020 is an angrier, darker, and more strategic version of the man we saw four years ago. He’s not only re-energized but also has an understandable and valid chip on his shoulder. But here’s the thing, this isn’t like that movie The Dark Knight where our protagonist gets to blur the lines of decorum while moving in the shadows undetected. This is more like 2019’s Joker where the actions of one angry man quite literally have the ability to influence millions.

Is there a smear campaign out against Sanders? Absolutely. And that is wrong. Full stop.

But if some of his supporters can’t tell the difference between those who seek to take him down versus those of us with valid questions and concerns that only feeds the culture of intolerance, bitterness, and tribalism that’s already tearing us apart.

When Trump loses the election in 2020 (which I wholeheartedly hope he does), we can’t allow four years of his foolishness to turn us into a bunch of defensive, mean spirited fanatics incapable of listening to opposing views. One could argue he still won in a whole other way.

And that concerns me deeply.

The post Why Black & Brown Bernie Sanders supporters need to hold his campaign accountable appeared first on TheGrio.



from TheGrio https://ift.tt/2w2lsOC
via

'How do I convince the UK Home Office I'm a lesbian?'

More than 1,500 people claim asylum in the UK each year, claiming that they are persecuted for being gay. But it's not an easy thing to prove.

from BBC News - Africa https://ift.tt/39Z3DP4
via

A Safety Board Faults Tesla and Regulators in a Fatal 2018 Crash

The National Transportation Safety Board says the automaker should restrict use of its Autopilot feature and better detect when drivers are paying attention.

from Wired https://ift.tt/3a4M1kP
via

Climate change: Why are tomato prices in Africa increasing?

The price of tomatoes have skyrocketed in East Africa in recent weeks after floods ruined crops.

from BBC News - Africa https://ift.tt/385tdAQ
via

Covid-19 Will Mark the End of Affluence Politics

The possibility of a global pandemic will reveal our inability to make and distribute the things people need—just in time for a presidential election.

from Wired https://ift.tt/2w3ROIL
via

Instrument may enable mail-in testing to detect heavy metals in water

Lead, arsenic, and other heavy metals are increasingly present in water systems around the world due to human activities, such as pesticide use and, more recently, the inadequate disposal of electronic waste. Chronic exposure to even trace levels of these contaminants, at concentrations of parts per billion, can cause debilitating health conditions in pregnant women, children, and other vulnerable populations.

Monitoring water for heavy metals is a formidable task, however, particularly for resource-constrained regions where workers must collect many liters of water and chemically preserve samples before transporting them to distant laboratories for analysis.

To simplify the monitoring process, MIT researchers have developed an approach called SEPSTAT, for solid-phase extraction, preservation, storage, transportation, and analysis of trace contaminants. The method is based on a small, user-friendly device the team developed, which absorbs trace contaminants in water and preserves them in a dry state so the samples can be easily dropped in the mail and shipped to a laboratory for further analysis.

A whisk-like device lined with small pockets filled with gold polymer beads, fits inside a typical sampling bottle, and can be twirled to pick up any metal contaminants in water.
A whisk-like device lined with small pockets filled with gold polymer beads, fits inside a typical sampling bottle, and can be twirled to pick up any metal contaminants in water.

The device resembles a small, flexible propeller, or whisk, which fits inside a typical sampling bottle. When twirled inside the bottle for several minutes, the instrument can absorb most of the trace contaminants in the water sample. A user can either air-dry the device or blot it with a piece of paper, then flatten it and mail it in an envelope to a laboratory, where scientists can dip it in a solution of acid to remove the contaminants and collect them for further analysis in the lab.

“We initially designed this for use in India, but it’s taught me a lot about our own water issues and trace contaminants in the United States,” says device designer Emily Hanhauser, a graduate student in MIT’s Department of Mechanical Engineering. “For instance, someone who has heard about the water crisis in Flint, Michigan, who now wants to know what’s in their water, might one day order something like this online, do the test themselves, and send it to a lab.”

Hanhauser and her colleagues recently published their results in the journal Environmental Science and Technology. Her MIT co-authors are Chintan Vaishnav of the Tata Center for Technology and Design and the MIT Sloan School of Management; John Hart, associate professor of mechanical engineering; and Rohit Karnik, professor of mechanical engineering and associate department head for education, along with Michael Bono of Boston University.

From teabags to whisks

The team originally set out to understand the water monitoring infrastructure in India. Millions of water samples are collected by workers at local laboratories all around the country, which are equipped to perform basic water quality analysis. However, to analyze trace contaminants, workers at these local labs need to chemically preserve large numbers of water samples and transport the vessels, often over hundreds of kilometers, to state capitals, where centralized labs have facilities to properly analyze trace contaminants.

“If you’re collecting a lot of these samples and trying to bring them to a lab, it’s pretty onerous work, and there is a significant transportation barrier,” Hanhauser says.

After the device is pulled out and dried, it can preserve any metal contaminants that it has picked up, for long periods of time. The device can be flattened and mailed to a lab, where the contaminants can be further analyzed.
After the device is pulled out and dried, it can preserve any metal contaminants that it has picked up, for long periods of time. The device can be flattened and mailed to a lab, where the contaminants can be further analyzed. 

In looking to streamline the logistics of water monitoring, she and her colleagues wondered whether they could bypass the need to transport the water, and instead transport the contaminants by themselves, in a dry state. 

They eventually found inspiration in dry blood spotting, a simple technique that involves pricking a person’s finger and collecting a drop of blood on a card of cellulose. When dried, the chemicals in the blood are stable and preserved, and the cards can be mailed off for further analysis, avoiding the need to preserve and ship large volumes of blood.

The team started thinking of a similar collection system for heavy metals, and looked through the literature for materials that could both absorb trace contaminants from water and keep them stable when dry.

They eventually settled on ion-exchange resins, a class of material that comes in the form of small polymer beads, several hundreds of microns wide. These beads contain groups of molecules bound to a hydrogen ion. When dipped in water, the hydrogen comes off and can be exchanged with another ion, such as a heavy metal cation, that takes hydrogen’s place on the bead. In this way, the beads can absorb heavy metals and other trace contaminants from water.

The researchers then looked for ways to immerse the beads in water, and first considered a teabag-like design. They filled a mesh-like pocket with beads and dunked it in water they spiked with heavy metals. They found, though, that it took days for the beads to adequately absorb the contaminants if they simply left the teabag in the water. When they stirred the teabag around, turbulence sped the process somewhat, but it still took far too long for the beads, packed into one large teabag, to absorb the contaminants.

Ultimately, Hanhauser found that a handheld stirring design worked best to take up metal contaminants in water within a reasonable amount of time. The device is made from a polymer mesh cut into several propeller-like panels. Within each panel, Hanhauser hand-stitched small pockets, which she filled with polymer beads. She then stitched each panel around a polymer stick to resemble a sort of egg beater or whisk.

Testing the waters

The researchers fabricated several of the devices, then tested them on samples of natural water collected around Boston, including the Charles and Mystic rivers. They spiked the samples with various heavy metal contaminants, such as lead, copper, nickel, and cadmium, then stuck a device in the bottle of each sample, and twirled it around by hand to catch and absorb the contaminants. They then placed the devices on a counter to dry overnight.

To recover the contaminants from the device, they dipped the device in hydrochloric acid. The hydrogen in the solution effectively knocks away any ions attached to the polymer beads, including heavy metals, which can then be collected and analyzed with instruments such as mass spectrometers.

The researchers found that by stirring the device in the water sample, the device was able to absorb and preserve about 94 percent of the metal contaminants in each sample. In their recent trials, they found they could still detect the contaminants and predict their concentrations in the original water samples, with an accuracy range of 10 to 20 percent, even after storing the device in a dry state for up to two years.

With a cost of less than $2, the researchers believe that the device could facilitate transport of samples to centralized laboratories, collection and preservation of samples for future analysis, and acquisition of water quality data in a centralized manner, which, in turn, could help to identify sources of contamination, guide policies, and enable improved water quality management.

The researchers have now partnered with a company in India, in hopes of commercializing the device. Together, their project was recently chosen as one of 26 proposals out of more than 950 to be funded by the Indian government under its Atal New India Challenge program.

This research was funded, in part, by the Abdul Latif Jameel Water and Food Systems Lab, the MIT Tata Center, and the National Science Foundation.  



from MIT News https://ift.tt/2PqnbUC
via

WNBA Commissioner Says Kobe Bryant Was Only Player to See Her Since She Got the Job

WNBA Commissioner Cathy Engelbert

Before his tragic untimely death, Kobe Bryant was the only NBA player to reach out to the new WNBA commissioner, according to Yahoo Finance.

Cathy Engelbert was hired as the WNBA commissioner last year and she said Bryant was the only current or former NBA player to schedule a meeting to chat with her. The meeting was scheduled to be for an hour and it ended up becoming a two-hour conversation.

“Kobe was a huge advocate for the WNBA, and for women and girls in sports. Girls drop out of sports at an alarming rate by the age of 13,” said Engelbert, noting that Gianna and her teammates were all 13. “Kobe also championed those who hoped to be a part of the league in the future by working with college teams like the University of Connecticut and University of Oregon. His impact was much broader than I certainly thought,” she told Yahoo.

Engelbert also told People that the WNBA has plans to honor Bryant’s daughter, Gianna and her Mamba Sports Academy teammates Alyssa Altobelli and Payton Chester, who also died in the fatal helicopter crash with Bryant, in the upcoming months. “Our next big tentpole for the WNBA is our draft in April, so we’ll clearly be honoring those three young 13-year-old basketball players, the future of our game.”

“I’ve been telling people that he’s the only NBA player that reached out and came to see me at the WNBA offices since I started as the commissioner six months ago,” she told PEOPLE. “The first thing he said to me was, ‘Cathy, I spent four hours every day on girls sports and I love it.’”

“We talked for two hours about his commitment to the WNBA, the women, the players and obviously his commitment to his team that he was coaching,” Engelbert continued. “[It’s] just really a loss and a loss of a big advocate.”

The 2020 season, which kicks off in May, will be the league’s 24th season and Engelbert and her team are thinking of a variety of ways to honor the victims. Plans are underway to plan a tribute ahead of Father’s Day.



from Black Enterprise https://ift.tt/37UCBqR
via

Erica’s Table of 20 delivers an intimate networking experience

erica's table of 20

If you take a five-minute scroll through your Instagram feed you will see a countless number of networking events, meet-ups, and conferences that all promise value, but Erica’s Table of 20 is different. Now in its 36th installment, Erica’s Table of 20 provides a different approach to the saturated business and entrepreneurial networking scene. Erica’s Table of 20 is an intimate experience for guests to gather, engage, fellowship, and connect in a genuine manner. Each guest is hand-selected, and there is no level of hierarchy that exists whether you are known on a national scale or simply doing great things within the community you reside in.

BLACK ENTERPRISE had the opportunity to discuss this experience with businesswoman, author, and change agent Erica Dias.

What makes Erica’s Table of 20 unique?

I often reference this experience as my version of “Sunday Dinner” that many of us used to have with family and friends. In my case, this Sunday dinner was hosted by my late grandmother, Helen Dias, who passed away from cancer. Guests would get dressed up, talk about everything under the sun, from worldly topics to their personal journey, paired with good food and laughter. All of my guests at this affair are selected due to their contributions in their respected communities, success within their careers, and value that they bring to everyone else at the dinner.

When did you realize that Erica’s table of 20 was really having an impact?

When men and women from all over the world began to inquire about attending the event I realized that this was bigger than just 20 people convening inside of Neiman Marcus. People have flown in from Nigeria, LA, Atlanta, Miami, and various other locations to take part in this gathering. It is an experience that cannot be duplicated.

You recently hosted your 36th Table of 20 in NYC. What is different about Erica’s Table of 20 in 2020 and moving forward?

2020 is a manifestation year as the Table of 20 travels to various cities. “Manifestation” meaning that each and every attendee will be challenged and inspired to put ideas into actions and actions into successes. As connections are formed throughout the event, each person at the table will be encouraged to connect with at least one person and have periodic “check-ins” to help encourage and push each other to manifest their goals. Marketing guru Ashunna Ayars and associate producer of The Wendy Williams Show, Derrick Warner, provided instrumental advice to the attendees.

Why are Erica’s Table of 20 events important for you?

As a businesswoman, author, and change agent, I am busy. I spend hours and hours helping others to build and grow their brands and visibility, oftentimes at the expense of my own goals. I recently re-released my best-selling book, Faith It Until You Make It, which is full of inspirational quotes that are bound to give you that pick-me-up that you need to get pumped up throughout the year. When I attend my event I am, in turn, getting a pick-me-up from each and every attendee. They may not realize it, but their stories and successes provide me with some of that much-needed inspiration to build my personal and professional brand. People, including myself, need that intimate approach to networking which challenges, inspires, and truly makes you move forward toward your goals.

How can we learn more about Erica’s Table of 20?

Get familiar with this event by visiting @TableOf20 on Instagram or visit the website at www.EricasTableOf20.com.



from Black Enterprise https://ift.tt/2Pq5LYt
via